Melissa W.

Posted

22 Oct 11:01

Image from Melissa W.'s post
1 / 2
Image from Melissa W.'s post
2 / 2

🫀 BLS/CPR HeartSaver Courses

Led by an American Heart Association Certified Instructor

One-on-one or group sessions available. Can’t make it to class? I’ll come to you — I’m fully mobile and bring all training equipment.

💰 Initials: $50 | Renewals: $35 | Recertifications: $40

📲 Call/Text (832) 953-3622

📧 HoustonBLSTraining@gmail.com

Stay certified. Stay ready.

Winos I got you 🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷

Posted

21 Oct 10:10

Image from Melissa W.'s post
1 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
2 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
3 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
4 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
5 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
6 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
7 / 8
Image from Melissa W.'s post
8 / 8

As far as I know Nicki ain't lied yet✨✨✨

Posted

15 Oct 17:13

****Trigger Warning**** 2 children, ages 9 and 10, charged with attempted murder, rape in brutal attack on 5-year-old girl, prosecutors say https://share.google/zdC1xo5qwYCQz0UwM

1

Posted

12 Oct 23:46

Image from Melissa W.'s post

These ppl have no chill. I'm sorry Dr.Wendy😝

4

Posted

12 Oct 19:30

Image from Melissa W.'s post

TRIGGER WARNING - A former Minnesota State Trooper, Jeremy Plonski, just pleaded guilty to producing and distributing CSAM (Child S*x Abuse Material), involving an infant and he’s getting a plea deal.

You read that right. A man who wore a badge, who swore to protect the public, filmed himself abusing a baby and shared it online. And instead of facing every single charge, he’s walking away with a deal. After abusing a BABY.

Here’s what that really means:

He admitted guilt to just two counts — one for producing and one for distributing CSAM. In exchange, two other federal charges are being dismissed at sentencing. The rest just disappear.

But it doesn’t end there. He’s still facing state charges for the sexual assault of that same infant. The fact that any of this can even be negotiated is beyond comprehension.

How do you abuse a baby, create that kind of material, and still get a plea deal?

How does anyone in power justify that?

This is exactly why I started a petition to end plea deals for predators. Because every time this happens, it sends one message: the system will protect offenders before it protects children.

Go sign it. Share it. Here is the link.

https://bit.ly/42R2dEr

We can’t keep letting people like this walk away with deals.

1

Posted

12 Oct 09:55

***Trigger Warning****

5

Posted

10 Oct 09:43

Chileeeee idk about y'all but I can't wait for this Katt Williams tea Cheickkkkkkkkkkkkk I know you got the lawyer on deck🤣🤣🤣

6

Posted

09 Oct 01:18

Image from Melissa W.'s post

I’m a fair person. So I researched.

Nicki Minaj claimed she was once offered $1M for what she thought was her stake in Tidal and suggested it could’ve been worth $200M. But filings never confirmed she—or other artists—actually had ownership.

When Jay-Z relaunched Tidal in 2015, it was pitched as “artist-owned,” but records show the holding company was controlled solely by him.

Music exec Steve Stoute later said many of those artists never signed shareholder agreements, meaning their supposed “equity” may have only been symbolic.

And if Hov, the actual owner, only walked away with about $350M when Tidal was sold, how could Nicki realistically believe her cut was worth $200M?

It does sound like shady business practices on Jay’s end until you actually research. As a businesswoman, Nicki should’ve secured something legally binding to guarantee her ownership.

Also, she was not an equity partner. She was an artist partner. Significant difference

2

Posted

09 Oct 01:18

Image from Melissa W.'s post

I’m a fair person. So I researched.

Nicki Minaj claimed she was once offered $1M for what she thought was her stake in Tidal and suggested it could’ve been worth $200M. But filings never confirmed she—or other artists—actually had ownership.

When Jay-Z relaunched Tidal in 2015, it was pitched as “artist-owned,” but records show the holding company was controlled solely by him.

Music exec Steve Stoute later said many of those artists never signed shareholder agreements, meaning their supposed “equity” may have only been symbolic.

And if Hov, the actual owner, only walked away with about $350M when Tidal was sold, how could Nicki realistically believe her cut was worth $200M?

It does sound like shady business practices on Jay’s end until you actually research. As a businesswoman, Nicki should’ve secured something legally binding to guarantee her ownership.

Also, she was not an equity partner. She was an artist partner. Significant difference

1

Posted

08 Oct 10:45

Happy hump day