Melissa W.

10 Oct 18:09

Yessssssss at first I was thinking fake news but shortly after saw it on TMZ

10 Oct 15:58

I'll be there for sure

Reply

Posted

10 Oct 09:43

Chileeeee idk about y'all but I can't wait for this Katt Williams tea Cheickkkkkkkkkkkkk I know you got the lawyer on deck🤣🤣🤣

6

I love this for you

Reply

🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷🍷

Posted

09 Oct 01:18

Image from Melissa W.'s post

I’m a fair person. So I researched.

Nicki Minaj claimed she was once offered $1M for what she thought was her stake in Tidal and suggested it could’ve been worth $200M. But filings never confirmed she—or other artists—actually had ownership.

When Jay-Z relaunched Tidal in 2015, it was pitched as “artist-owned,” but records show the holding company was controlled solely by him.

Music exec Steve Stoute later said many of those artists never signed shareholder agreements, meaning their supposed “equity” may have only been symbolic.

And if Hov, the actual owner, only walked away with about $350M when Tidal was sold, how could Nicki realistically believe her cut was worth $200M?

It does sound like shady business practices on Jay’s end until you actually research. As a businesswoman, Nicki should’ve secured something legally binding to guarantee her ownership.

Also, she was not an equity partner. She was an artist partner. Significant difference

2

Posted

09 Oct 01:18

Image from Melissa W.'s post

I’m a fair person. So I researched.

Nicki Minaj claimed she was once offered $1M for what she thought was her stake in Tidal and suggested it could’ve been worth $200M. But filings never confirmed she—or other artists—actually had ownership.

When Jay-Z relaunched Tidal in 2015, it was pitched as “artist-owned,” but records show the holding company was controlled solely by him.

Music exec Steve Stoute later said many of those artists never signed shareholder agreements, meaning their supposed “equity” may have only been symbolic.

And if Hov, the actual owner, only walked away with about $350M when Tidal was sold, how could Nicki realistically believe her cut was worth $200M?

It does sound like shady business practices on Jay’s end until you actually research. As a businesswoman, Nicki should’ve secured something legally binding to guarantee her ownership.

Also, she was not an equity partner. She was an artist partner. Significant difference

1

Posted

08 Oct 10:45

Happy hump day

This is so fucked up my heart aches for this baby and her mother

Reply

Yessssssss ASAP

Reply